What city is nicer san francisco or los angeles?
Answers:
that would entirely depend on what you definate "nicer" as anyone.
If you like the shoreline, warm temps, ultra cool hip place beside young folks, afterwards LA is your best bet.
If you are more intellectual, outdoorsy, laid back and not over-involved on image, after San Francisco is the place.
I grew up in the SF nouns and much prefer the laid back attitude of the san francisco nouns. LA completely stresses me out. too many population, too many cars, agency too warm of weather and extremely superficial.
P.S. to the guy who called it San Fran, us locals call upon it "The City". San Fran labels you as non-local.
Depends what you demarcate as "nicer."I'll assume you mean nice neighborhoods, cleaner nouns, cosmopolitan feel next hands down its San Fran. LA'ers will contest that they hold more culture and attractions than San Fran.
San Francisco.
1. It's prettier. (less smog, better site...)
2. It's got a much better vibe. (less stressful, more chill.)
3. It have a lot to grant. (national parks, good neighborhoods, diversity, college areas, etc...)
4. Good weather. (Not too hot, not too cold. a short time foggy.)
5. Less judgemental. (Less botox/plastic surgery pressures in general)
I have to voice San Francisco nicer, better weather, less smog, the empire are friendler, so San Francisco, if only I can read out that about their errand market
Los Angeles have beautiful parts, but unless you earn a nice income, or are someone approaching Angelina Jolie, dont expect to be living in anything out of danger. Los Angeles is on the high come to an end of most dangerous cities contained by the United States.
It really depends on what your looking for.
For the stereotypical California lifestyle choose Los Angeles.
For something excluding that choose San Francisco.
I have lived contained by Northern California for close to 50 years and just budge to LA to remind myself why I like it up here so much more.
I love them both!
LA
San Francisco is path better and Los Angeles is polluted way to much and contained by San Francisco you cn go to:
Golden Gate
Alcatraz
Coit Tower
Union Square
Fishermans Wharf
City Hall
ChinaTown
Cable Car
BART
Muni
ETC
They are both "nice" cities, but San Francisco has more to do within terms of attractions. While Los Angeles is better for partying and raise a family. They're both really cool though.
Humble Advisor, don't ring it "san fran" nobody likes it.
SAN FRANCISCO!!
What I want to know is how can culture afford to live in San Francisco?
SAN FRANCISCO IS MUCH NICER
I live within the Bay area, and I love LA a ton more. Despite the crap traffic within, the people are nicer and it's alot more affordable and the weather is better.
San Francisco has more of an "Old City" urban discern to it. It has more individuality, sophistication and charm than Los Angeles. It boasts one of the most beautiful inborn settings in the country (maybe the world) and is a relatively compact, pedestrian friendly city near an excellent mass transit system. It also has more rainfall and cooler temperatures than L.A. Los Angeles equally is a sprawling city with a stove climate more palm trees and (unfortunately) more smog. So it depends what you're looking for. Personally I prefer San Francisco but I like L.A. too.
San Francisco perceptibly!
Related Questions:
