Would you liv within los angeles or san francisco?



Answers:   
san francisco 100%!
theres too many freeways within L.A.
if i had a choice? LA. closer to EVERYTHING thats scheduled. but then again san fran is pretty cool too. lol
SF! LA is completely disgusting. Ewwww.
I'd own to go beside San Francisco. LA is just to spread out for me. I might not be living close at hand work and I might have to spend hours surrounded by traffic just to achieve to work. I like SF because i'm closer to everything and it doesnt nick as long to go places.
Hi--good question. I close to San Fran & all, but I would own to say L.A. The weather is better, they hold beaches, the individuals aren't as liberal, and unbelievalby it's cheaper.
SF. LA is way too muggy and full of traffic.
San Franciso to me is better
I live in San Francisco, but I close to LA a lot, too, except for breathing near.
I hold lived in both cities, they're totally different. LA is great for populace who love to sit in traffic. Seriously though, LA is so massive, it's approaching a state. If you find a place to live that's close to where you work, next life can be pretty appropriate.

San Francisco is very small and compact. There more going on contained by SF in a 7 mile radius than surrounded by all of LA at any given time. That said, it's more expensive to live contained by SF.

Overall, San Francisco is a better place to live in my assessment.
san francisco...it is home already. i am not a particular devotee of LA's weather, too warm for me year round. and i am not much of a beachy type personality. SF is a bit more "intellectual, thinker" type place the LA. LA is seen as self fun, laid back.
san francisco! the heavens in LA is so stale
neither
I've lived within both cities, and they're each great contained by their own way. It really does depend on your out of the ordinary taste.

The San Diego Union Tribune (a impartial party) did a side-by-side comparison of the two cities in 2006, and I ruminate it's pretty much spot on:

http://www.signonsandiego.com/sports/200...
Well I know my agency around San Fransisco better, and I like the those better, so probably San Fran
I prefer SF.

The LA mindset is very different than SF mindset. Most populace like one city or the other, terrifically few like both.

I hold friends in LA and stop by at least once every year or so. I've lived within So. CA and don't care much for LA too spread out, too fixated on repute, money and superficial appearance.


Related Questions:
Needed: Best Dining bet at Disney World beside youthful children.?   How far is it from Chicago O'Hare Airport to the Downtown HIlton?   What else is near to do within Anaheim besides Disneyland?   Is it true that theres a rat for every topical yorker?   Are in attendance any babyish full-size (18-21) shelters contained by Chicago, Ill?  
  • Questions to CTA n Metra?
  • I'm going the the spanking new England aquarium?
  • New York tourist attractions?10 points?