Boston vs Chicago?

Which one is better and why?



Answers:   
i would choose chicago purely because it is so much more affordable than boston---in boston studios start at 1200 while chicago you can get nice apts for 500 hundred dollars less--besides that chicago of late blows boston away in adjectives categories----i never understood why boston be so expensive, for that much money i would rather live contained by nyc for a couple hundred more and not be surrounded by stuck up ivy leaguers in boston
Chicago - the Chicago White Sox
Chicago, hand down. It has a better darkness life, better sports, and better places to see.
Chicago without a doubt. Never been nearby before. But if my
research serves me correctly. Chicago is much prettier
inside and out. Better layout. Sophisticated setting,
fresher nouns. A nice lake, Oprah, The Bulls. Excellent
food, especially the pizza. Beautiful women, awesome
skyline. With the worlds tallest building. Or it use to be
anyway. Is that biddable enough ?
You ask this question surrounded by the Chicago forum?

well duh!

I will turn with Boston.
i live surrounded by boston and would recommend chicago. both are beautiful, world-class cities but chicago is more affordable and have nicer people living within. just my two cents.


Related Questions:
Anyone get any discount codes for centreparcs for april 2008?   Employment?   What’s it similar to contained by Quartzsite, Arizona during the rock and mineral show?   I hold be on a Section 3 underneath the mental robustness perform...is it still possible for me to work surrounded by America for 6.   I once go to a place on a hill/mountain within upstate South Carolina?  
  • Where are the well-mannered places to be in motion cliff jump at Lake Mead?
  • Do really dumb travel question bother you?
  • Ukiah California Anyone?